9 Training and Professional Development

Chapter 10 of the Dynamic Learning Maps® (DLM®) Alternate Assessment System 2015–2016 Technical Manual—Science (Dynamic Learning Maps Consortium, 2017) provides a complete description of training and professional development for DLM assessments, including the required test administrator training and the optional instructional professional development for educators.

This chapter presents participation rates and evaluation results from the 2024–2025 optional instructional professional development modules. Overall, required training and professional development remained consistent with the 2024–2025 implementation.

For a complete description of required test administrator training and professional development for instruction, see Chapter 10 of the 2015–2016 Technical Manual—Science (Dynamic Learning Maps Consortium, 2017).

9.1 Instructional Professional Development

The DLM professional development system is built to support educators in their efforts to teach science to students who take DLM tests. In addition to providing instructional support, the instructional professional development modules also teach educators about the DLM system. While the modules were originally intended for educators who administer DLM assessments, system data suggest that preservice educators, related service providers, parents, and others also access and complete the modules.

There are a total of 12 science modules, which are listed in section 9.1.1.2 of this chapter. The 12 modules are available in both self-directed and facilitated formats. The self-directed modules are available online via an open-access, interactive portal that combines videos, text, student work samples, and online learning activities to engage educators with a range of content, strategies, and supports. The portal also gives educators the opportunity to reflect on and apply what they are learning. Each module ends with a post-test, and educators who achieve a score of 80% or higher on the post-test receive a certificate via email. To support state and local education agencies in providing continuing education credits to educators who complete the modules, each module includes a time-ordered agenda, learning objectives, and biographical information on the developers of the training modules.

9.1.1 Professional Development Participation and Evaluation

There are two ways in which test administrators and educators may complete professional development modules: through their required test administrator training or, optionally, through the professional development website. Some states require one or more of the optional professional development modules to be completed as part of the required test administrator training. States can require that certain modules be completed by new test administrators, returning test administrators, or both. Test administrators completing professional development modules as part of the required test administrator training access the modules through the Moodle training site where the rest of the required test administration training is located. Professional development modules are also available through the DLM professional development website. The modules on the professional development website can be accessed by anyone and completed at any time. Participants completing modules on the website are administered a short evaluation survey following each module. The evaluation survey is not included in the required test administrator training. With the exception of the evaluation survey, the content of the modules is identical in the required test administrator training and the professional development website.

9.1.1.1 Required Professional Development Participation

A total of eight states required at least one professional development module as part of their required test administrator training. The modules included in the required test administrator training are required of all relevant test administrators (i.e., new or returning, as specified by the state). For example, a test administrator who only administers science assessments may still be required to complete a module on instruction for ELA. Table 9.1 shows the number of modules required, by state, for new and returning test administrators, as well as the total number of modules completed in 2024–2025. In total, 8,099 professional development modules were completed by 2,257 new and 1,156 returning test administrators as part of the required training.

Table 9.1: Number of Professional Development Modules Completed as Part of the Required Test Administrator Training in 2024–2025
New test administrators
Returning test administrators
State Required modules Test administrators Required modules Test administrators Total modules completed
Alaska 2   69    138
Delaware 1 120    120
Maryland 2 719 1,438
New Hampshire 1 132    132
New Mexico 3 317 1 523 1,474
Oklahoma 5 614 3,070
Utah 1   61 1 275    336
West Virginia 3 225 2 358 1,391

Table 9.2 shows which modules were required for new and returning test administrators across all states choosing to include professional development modules in the required training. For example, the Effective Instruction in Mathematics module was required for new test administrators in two states and was required for returning test administrators in one state.

Table 9.2: Professional Development Modules Selected for Inclusion in Required Test Administrator Training in 2024–2025
Module States requiring for new test administrators States requiring for returning test administrators Total modules completed
DLM Essential Elements Overview 4 1,114
Effective Instruction in Mathematics 2 1 1,177
Individual Education Programs Linked to the DLM Essential Elements 4 1,678
Principles of Instruction in ELA 2 1 1,179
Who Are Students With the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities? 6 2 2,862

9.1.1.2 Optional Professional Development Participation

Table 9.3 shows the number of individuals who completed optional professional development modules through the DLM professional development website and the total number of test administrators from each state who had a student rostered for the DLM assessment. In total, 189 modules were completed in the self-directed format from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. Since the first module was launched in the fall of 2017, a total of 4,139 modules have been completed on the professional development website.

Table 9.3: Number of Self-Directed Modules Completed in 2024–2025 (N = 189) by Educators in DLM States and Other Locations
State Participants DLM test administrators Total modules completed
Alaska   0    123   0
Arkansas   3    726   8
Delaware   3    151   5
District of Columbia   0    121   0
Illinois   2 1,985   3
Iowa 22    534 46
Kansas   1    532   3
Maryland   1 1,013   2
Missouri   0 1,182   0
New Hampshire   0    170   0
New Jersey   1 1,893   5
New Mexico   0    441   0
New York   4 3,927 17
North Dakota   0    163   0
Oklahoma   1    920   1
Pennsylvania   5 3,055 12
Rhode Island   2    164   5
Utah 16    744 26
West Virginia   2    334 21
Wisconsin   2 1,071   2
Non-DLM state and other locations 20 33
Note. Participant counts may include individuals who are not educators or test administrators (e.g., preservice educators).

To evaluate educator perceptions of the utility and applicability of the modules, DLM staff ask educators to respond to a series of evaluation questions on completion of each self-directed module. Educators responded to questions about the importance of content, whether new concepts were presented, the utility of the module, and whether educators planned to use what they learned. Educators respond using a 4-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. During the 2024–2025 year, across all modules, educators completed the evaluation questions 68% of the time, with response rates for modules taken by at least five educators ranging from 20% to 89% per module. The responses were consistently positive, as illustrated in Table 9.4. Across all modules, 36% of respondents either agreed or strongly agreed with each statement.

To evaluate the consistency in the ratings for each module, we calculated Cronbach’s (1951) alpha from the four items for each module using all ratings from fall 2017 through the 2024–2025 year. Across all modules, alpha ranged from .95 to >.99, with an average value of .98, suggesting high internal consistency in responses.

Table 9.4: Response Rates and Rate of Agree or Strongly Agree on 2024–2025 Self-Directed Module Evaluation Questions

9.2 Conclusion

The DLM system makes training and instructional professional development modules available to test administrators and educators, as well as state and local education agency staff. The required test administrator training is designed to ensure that test administrators understand the DLM system to administer the assessments with fidelity; it did not change in 2024–2025. Complementary to the required training are the professional development modules, which provide participants learning opportunities to support instructional practices aligned with content measured by DLM assessments. In 2024–2025, participants provided consistently positive feedback regarding the importance and relevance of the professional development modules, although participation was low relative to the educator population.